Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in Japan: Results from the World Mental Health Japan Survey

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.01.015Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to report the prevalence of trauma exposure and PTSD, conditional risk of PTSD associated with each trauma exposure in the community population in Japan. An interview survey was conducted of a random sample of adult residents in 11 communities of Japan. Among 4134 respondents (response rate, 55%), data from those who completed the part 2 interview (n = 1682) were analyzed with a weight for this subsample. Lifetime experiences of 27 trauma events and PTSD were assessed using the WHO-Composite International Diagnostic Interview version 3.0. Sixty percent of the part 2 sample reported exposure to at least one lifetime traumatic event. Lifetime and 12-month PTSD prevalences were 1.3% and 0.7%, respectively. Percentage of all months lived with PTSD in the population was predominantly accounted for by physical/sexual assaults and having a child with serious illness, and unexpected death of loved one. Ten percent of respondents reported “private events”, for which respondents did not have to describe the content, which accounted for 19% of months with PTSD. The lower prevalence of PTSD in Japan seems attributable to lower conditional risks of PTSD following these events, as well as different distributions of the events. The greater impact of events that occurred to loved ones rather than to oneself and “private events” on PTSD in Japan warrants further research of cross-cultural assessment of trauma exposure and cultural heterogeneity in the trauma-PTSD relationship.

Introduction

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) occurs after exposure to traumatic events and is characterized by symptoms of re-experiencing, numbing and hyperarousal. Lifetime exposure to traumatic events is very common ranging from 50% to 80% in community samples (Atwoli et al., 2013, Kessler et al., 1995, Mills et al., 2011, Norris et al., 2003, Seedat et al., 2009) and a primary care sample (Bruce et al., 2001). However, the vast majority of persons exposed to a traumatic event do not develop PTSD. The prevalence of PTSD varies widely across countries (Karam et al., 2014, Kessler et al., 2007, Matsuoka et al., 2010). For instance, the World Health Organization (WHO) Word Mental Health Surveys reported that mean 12-month prevalence of PTSD was 1.1%, but the prevalence ranged from 0.4% to 3.8%, among 20 participating countries (Karam et al., 2014). The 12 month prevalence of PTSD was high (3–6%) in Western countries, such as the US (Kessler et al., 2005a, Kessler et al., 2005b, Kessler and Wang, 2008, Pietrzak et al., 2011), Australia (Chapman et al., 2012, Mills et al., 2011) and New Zealand (Oakley Browne et al., 2006, Wells et al., 2006), and was low among Asian countries (0.7% in Korea and 0.2% in China)(Cho et al., 2007, Shen et al., 2006). This cross-national variation in prevalence of PTSD could be explained by differential prevalences of traumatic exposures and/or a conditional risk of PTSD by the type of trauma exposure (Breslau et al., 1998, Bruce et al., 2001, Kessler et al., 1995, Norris et al., 2003, Pietrzak et al., 2011, Zlotnick et al., 2006), both of which could vary among countries depending on the social and cultural background. However, information of the trauma exposure patterns and the conditional risk of PTSD following exposure to trauma in low prevalence countries, such as Asia, is still lacking.

In Japan, 12-month prevalence of PTSD was reported as 0.4% (Kawakami et al., 2005), which is lower than ones reported in the US (Kessler et al., 2005a, Kessler et al., 2005b) and New Zealand (Oakley Browne et al., 2006, Wells et al., 2006); it was close to those in Korea and China (Cho et al., 2007, Shen et al., 2006). While traumatic events were reported to be quite common (80%) among women in a primary care sample (Mizuta et al., 2005), traumatic events related to crime and violence are less frequent in Japan (OECD., 2009). On the other hand, Japan is at a higher risk of natural disaster (United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security, 2012), which may contribute to the increased risk for psychological distress and PTSD in Japan (Fukuda et al., 2000, Goto et al., 2002, Kato and Iwai, 2000; Kuwabara et al., 2008, Suzuki et al., 2011). Motor vehicle accident (Hamanaka et al., 2006, Matsuoka et al., 2008, Nishi et al., 2013), the illness of one's own (Akechi et al., 2004) or families (Nagata et al., 2008) , bereavement (Shirai et al., 2005), terrorism attack(Kawana et al., 2001, Ohtani et al., 2004), and being atomic bomb survivors (Ohta, 2002) were also reported to be associated with PTSD in Japan. However, these studies are methodologically weak, of samples only exposed to traumas, often using a symptom checklist to identify PTSD cases, and none was based on a whole community population. It would be interesting to know how a unique pattern of the exposure to traumatic events and the conditional risk of PTSD associated with such events in Japan contribute to the lower prevalence of PTSD in this country, and to know if there is a particular trauma which has a greater impact on PTSD in Japan than in Western countries. However, there is no previous study which has provided such an overall picture of trauma exposure and PTSD in the whole community population of Japan, using comparative methodology with previous surveys in the US and Europe.

For demographic correlates of PTSD, previous research has reported that female gender (Creamer et al., 2001, Kessler et al., 1995, Pietrzak et al., 2011), younger age (Creamer et al., 2001) or middle-age (Pietrzak et al., 2011) and being previously married or single (Atwoli et al., 2013, Creamer et al., 2001, Kessler et al., 1995, Pietrzak et al., 2011) and poor socioeconomic position (Carey et al., 2003, Pietrzak et al., 2011) were associated with PTSD. Women were at higher risk of PTSD than men, even after controlling for type of trauma (Breslau et al., 1999, Kessler et al., 1995); so were women being previously married (Kessler et al., 1995). Previous exposure to trauma signaled a greater risk of PTSD from subsequent trauma (Breslau et al., 1999). There is still limited research on the demographic-trauma exposure-PTSD associations outside Western countries.

The purpose of the study was three-fold. First, the study reports 12-month and lifetime prevalences of PTSD in the community population in Japan, based on the World Mental Health Survey Japan (WMH-J). While we already reported a 12-month prevalence based on part of the sample in this survey done in 2002 and 2003 (Kawakami et al., 2005), the study updates the prevalences using a larger final sample collected between 2002 and 2006. Second, the study reports lifetime prevalences of trauma exposure, conditional risk of PTSD associated with trauma exposure, and proportion of PTSD cases attributable to each trauma exposure. Third, the study reports demographic correlates of lifetime PTSD.

Section snippets

Sample

Analysis was conducted on the data collected by WMH-J from 2002 until 2006 (Kawakami et al., 2005), which was a part of the cross-national World Mental Health surveys (WMH)(Kessler et al., 2006). Survey participants were community residents aged 20 years or older and were randomly selected from voter registration lists or resident registries at 11 collaborating survey sites.

Data collection

Participants were interviewed face-to-face using a computer-assisted personal-interview. The instrument used in this study

Trauma exposure

Approximately sixty percent of the respondents (n = 1138) reported exposure to at least one traumatic event in their lifetime. A total of 1207 events (either random or worst events) were reported in the sample. The left column of Table 1 shows prevalences of traumatic events. Among the six traumatic event classes, network events (30.2%) was the most prevalent followed by unexpected death of a loved one (23.7%) and accidents (22.8%). The right column of Table 1 shows the mean number of each

Prevalences of trauma exposure and PTSD in Japan

Approximately sixty percent of the respondents reported exposure to at least one traumatic event in their lifetime. This is comparable to the proportion of people who experienced traumatic events in the lifetime (51–83%) in US (Kessler et al., 1995), Mexico (Norris et al., 2003), Australia (Mills et al., 2011), New Zealand (Mills et al., 2011), and South Africa (Atwoli et al., 2013, Seedat et al., 2009). Like these previous studies, witnessing physical fight and life-threatening illness were

Conflict of interests

Although there seems to be no actual conflict of interest, the potential conflict of interest is to be addressed as follows. N. Kawakami has been a consultant for Sekisui Chemical, Co., Ltd., Junpukai Health Care, Ds's Mental Health Labo, Ltd., and Riken Institute. He has had research support for his epidemiological studies from Fujitsu Infosoft Technologies, Ltd., Tak, Ltd., and NEC Soft, Ltd. R. Kessler has been a consultant for AstraZeneca, Analysis Group, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cerner-Galt

Contributors

N. Kawakami designed the study, collected data, conducted the literature review and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. M. Tsuchiya conducted statistical analysis. M. Umeda conducted literature search. K. Koenen designed the study. R. Kessler designed the study and conducted statistical analysis. All author collected data, and contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Role of funding source

The WMH Japan 2002–2006 Survey was supported by the Grant for Research on Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases and Mental Health from the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (H13-SHOGAI-023, H14-TOKUBETSU-026, H16-KOKORO-013, H19-KOKORO-IPPAN-011, H20-KOKORO-IPPAN-009). The survey was carried out in conjunction with the World Health Organization World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative which is supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH; R01 MH070884 and R01

Acknowledgment

The WMH-J 2002–2006 Survey Group members other than those listed in the author byline are as follows: Yutaka Ono, MD (Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center for Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan), Yoshibumi Nakane, MD (Dejima Shinryosho [Dejima Mental Clinic], Nagasaki, Japan, and Prof. Emeritus of Nagasaki University), Yosikazu Nakamura, MD, MPH, FFPH (Department of Public Health, Jichi Medical University), Akira Fukao, MD (Department of Public Health, Yamagata

References (49)

  • C. Chapman et al.

    Remission from post-traumatic stress disorder in the general population

    Psychol Med

    (2012)
  • M.J. Cho et al.

    Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-IV psychiatric disorders among Korean adults

    J Nerv Ment Dis

    (2007)
  • M. Creamer et al.

    Post-traumatic stress disorder: findings from the Australian national survey of mental health and well-being

    Psychol Med

    (2001)
  • J. Dussich

    Decisions not to report sexual assault: a comparative study among women living in Japan who are Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and English-speaking

    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol

    (2001)
  • A. Fogel et al.

    A comparison of the parent–child relationship in Japan and the United States

  • S. Fukuda et al.

    Effect of the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake on posttraumatic stress, lifestyle changes, and cortisol levels of victims

    Arch Environ Health

    (2000)
  • T. Goto et al.

    PTSD, depression and help-seeking patterns following the Miyake Island volcanic eruption

    Int J Emerg Ment Health

    (2002)
  • E.G. Karam et al.

    Cumulative traumas and risk thresholds: 12-month Ptsd in the world mental health (Wmh) surveys

    Depress Anxiety

    (2014)
  • H. Kato et al.

    Posttraumatic stress disorder after the Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake: assessment by the structured interview to the survivors

    Med J Kobe Univ

    (2000)
  • N. Kawakami et al.

    Twelve-month prevalence, severity, and treatment of common mental disorders in communities in Japan: preliminary finding from the World Mental Health Japan Survey 2002–2003

    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

    (2005)
  • N. Kawana et al.

    Psycho-physiological effects of the terrorist sarin attack on the Tokyo subway system

    Mil Med

    (2001)
  • R.C. Kessler et al.

    Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization's World Mental Health Survey initiative

    World Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • R.C. Kessler et al.

    Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • R.C. Kessler et al.

    Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Migrations, trauma and mental health: A literature update on psychological assessment

      2020, Encephale
      Citation Excerpt :

      For the data analysis, the articles were first separated into two groups: a) risk factors (i.e. factors associated with psychopathology, n = 36) and b) protection factors (i.e. factors associated with growth and resilience, n = 20) and then assessed according to the following aspects: (1) population, (2) risk/protection factors before, during and after migration, (3) instruments used for psychological evaluation. Traumatic events such as wars, natural disasters, domestic and sexual violence are highly prevalent worldwide [12–14]. The range of possible mental health outcomes in the aftermath of these adverse events is broad.

    • Associations between PTSD symptoms and suicide risk: A comparison of 4-factor and 7-factor models

      2020, Journal of Psychiatric Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      If you have experienced multiple events within the same item, please consider the most traumatic one when answering.” The reason for using the WHO-CIDI items was that it enabled us to compare our data with the only reported national data on the PTSD prevalence in Japan (Kawakami et al., 2014). We used a 4-point scale to assess participants’ lifetime experiences (0: never experienced; 1: experienced within the last month; 2: experienced once more than 1 month ago; and 3: experienced at least twice more than 1 month ago).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text