Elsevier

Journal of Psychiatric Research

Volume 61, February 2015, Pages 57-63
Journal of Psychiatric Research

Variation in the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRHR1) gene modulates age effects on working memory

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.12.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Changes in CRH-system during aging impair hippocampal function and working memory.

  • Variation within the CRHR1 gene influences stress vulnerability and brain activity.

  • Results indicate genetically driven subtype of early working memory impairments.

  • Deficits might be due to alterations in hippocampal CRHR1 activation.

  • Interventions for delaying premature memory decline warranted for subjects at risk.

Abstract

Decline in working memory (WM) functions during aging has been associated with hippocampal dysfunction mediated by age-related changes to the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) system. Recent reports suggest that GG-homozygous individuals of single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs110402 and rs242924) in the CRH receptor 1 (CRHR1) gene show increased stress vulnerability and decreased BOLD responses in WM relevant regions. However, until now, no study investigated the interaction effects of variation in the CRHR1 gene and age on individual differences in WM.

Here, young, middle-aged and old subjects (N = 466) were genotyped for rs110402 and rs242924 within the CRHR1 gene and an n-back task was used to investigate the hypothesis that vulnerable genotypes (GG-homozygotes) would show impaired WM functions that might be magnified by increased CRH production with advancing age. Our results show an impact of genotype already in middle-age with significantly better performance in AT-carriers. Working memory performance in AT-carriers did not differ between young and middle-aged subjects, but was significantly impaired in old age. In GG-homozygotes, severe working memory dysfunction occurred already in middle age. Our data indicate that GG-homozygotes of CRHR1 rs110402 and rs242924 represent a genetically driven subtype of early WM impairments due to alterations in hippocampal CRHR1 activation. Early interventions that have proven effective in delaying cognitive decline appear to be particularly important for these subjects at risk for premature memory decline, who are in the prime of their personal and professional lives.

Introduction

Aging is associated with decline across a wide range of cognitive abilities (Baltes and Lindenberger, 1997) that might be relatively subtle, but nevertheless troublesome for the affected individuals and impair their quality of life. Thus, with the increase in average lifespan, understanding the mechanisms that underlie age-associated cognitive decline is of growing importance. Working memory (WM) is one of the cognitive functions most sensitive to aging (Reuter-Lorenz and Park, 2010, Sander et al., 2012) and describes the temporarily storage of information while simultaneously controlling, manipulating and protecting it from distraction to generate goal-directed behavior (Baddeley, 2003). Among other brain regions, the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and hippocampus (HC) are implicated in cognitive functions relevant to WM and particularly relevant for working-memory maintenance (Oztekin et al., 2009, Henke, 2010). Accordingly, several studies reported that the age-related decline in WM performance is associated with volume reductions in hippocampus (Bergfield et al., 2010, Penner et al., 2010, Walhovd et al., 2011, Hara et al., 2012). However, there is also some evidence from animal models and human studies indicating that HC remains structurally intact during normal aging, particularly when HC volume is corrected for total brain volume (Sullivan et al., 2005, Burke and Barnes, 2006, Knoops et al., 2012). Impairment in hippocampal-dependent memory might therefore not be due to massive cell death, but rather to HC dysfunction mediated by age-related changes to the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (Swaab et al., 2005, Lupien et al., 2009, Penner et al., 2010, Aguilera, 2011).

The CRH system is crucial for neuroendocrine and behavioral responses to stress (Dunn and Berridge, 1990, Owens and Nemeroff, 1992). In the hippocampus, CRH is expressed in interneurons and released into the synaptic space to activate CRH receptors (CRHR1) located on pyramidal cell dendrites in response to stress (Chen et al., 2001, Ivy et al., 2010). Previous studies have shown that CRH in hippocampus acts via CRHR1 to induce long-term potentiation (LTP) or potentiate the magnitude of LTP (Blank et al., 2002, Schierloh et al., 2007). Chronic CRHR1 occupancy negatively affects dendritic arborization in vitro and is involved in CRH-induced neuron apoptosis, while administration of a CRHR1 blocker improves memory performance and prevents dendritic atrophy and LTP attenuation (Chen et al., 2010, Maras and Baram, 2012, Zhang et al., 2012). Even though the effects of aging on CRH regulation are far from clear, the majority of studies describe increased CRH production with advancing age (Swaab et al., 2005, Aguilera, 2011). It has been suggested that low-level activation of CRHR1 for short durations may enhance hippocampal function, whereas longer exposure to high levels of CRH may be deleterious (Maras and Baram, 2012). Alterations in hippocampal CRHR1 activation might therefore play an important role for the structural, functional and cognitive impairments associated with aging.

While it is well-known that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the progressive WM deficits emerging with aging (Finkel et al., 2005, Lindenberger et al., 2008), more than 60% of individual differences in cognitive abilities are heritable (Friedman et al., 2008) and remarkably stable across the adult lifespan (Deary et al., 2004, Finkel et al., 2005). The mechanisms by which genetic factors might promote progressive memory dysfunction remain largely unknown, though. Gene-cognition association studies on memory-related functions have mainly focused on the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) and Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) genes (Goldberg and Weinberger, 2004, Savitz et al., 2006), and shown that aging magnifies the effect of genotype on WM performance (Lindenberger et al., 2008, Nagel et al., 2008). However, despite extensive studies on the respective effects of aging on WM, CRH regulation and hippocampus structure and function, the effects of genetic variation within the CRH receptor 1 gene on WM performance have not been described yet. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CRHR1 gene are associated with behavioral and neuroendocrine evidence of stress vulnerability or resilience. In particular, the rs110402 A and rs242924 T alleles seem to have a protective effect against major depressive disorder (MDD) in individuals exposed to moderate and severe early life stress (ELS) (Bradley et al., 2008, Polanczyk et al., 2009). Accordingly, in healthy subjects with GG genotype on both SNPs an ELS × CRHR1 genotype interaction is reflected in an elevated cortisol response to the dexamethasone/corticotropin-releasing hormone test (DEX/CRH test) (Tyrka et al., 2009). Recent results in healthy humans and animal data showed lesser BOLD-responses in the MTL in GG-homozygotes (Hsu et al., 2012) and that CRHR1 SNPs influence metabolic activity in the anterior hippocampus (Rogers et al., 2013). The mechanism by which rs110402 and rs242924 affect the function of CRHR1 is presently unknown. Variations of these polymorphisms may affect the regulation of CRHR1 receptors, resulting in increased stress vulnerability, altered neural activity and consequently affected WM performance. Aging might magnify the genetic effects on WM and be associated with more pronounced WM impairments in the less stress-resilient GG-homozygotes.

There is considerable evidence that cognitive competencies in old age might be enhanced by positive emotional stimuli (Broster et al., 2012, Nashiro et al., 2012). The tendency for older adults to perform better on positively valenced stimuli with regard to measures of attention and memory has been termed the age-related positivity effect (Mather and Knight, 2005, Lockenhoff and Carstensen, 2007), and it was recently shown that positive words also attenuate age-related differences in WM (Mammarella et al., 2013).

The goal of the current study was to examine the interaction effects of variation in the CRHR1 gene and age on individual differences in WM. Since GG-homozygous individuals of rs110402 and rs242924 show greater stress vulnerability, elevated cortisol response and decreased BOLD responses in WM relevant regions, we hypothesized impaired WM performance in GG-homozygotes that might be magnified by increased CRH production with advancing age.

As several previous studies demonstrated a positivity effect in older adults with enhanced memory performance for positive stimuli, we furthermore aimed to investigate whether old subjects could at least partially compensate for their memory deficits if positive stimuli were presented and whether this effect might differ depending on the genotype.

Section snippets

Subjects

All subjects were recruited from responses to advertising in local newspapers and mailing lists. Subjects were screened for psychiatric disorders using the short version of the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV, SCID). Inclusion criteria were age 18–90 years, absence of present and past diagnosis of psychiatric or neurologic disease, absence of major or unstable general medical conditions, and ability to participate in study

Sample

Data from 20 subjects could not be evaluated because of missing n-back or questionnaire data. Furthermore, we had to exclude 24 subjects with missing genetic data, 9 subjects with rare genotype combinations (see genotyping section), 19 extreme outliers in the n-back task (performance deviating more than 3 SD from the mean) and 3 subjects with an IQ below average. This resulted in a final sample size of N = 466 (see Table 2). The sample was divided into 3 age groups (young: 18–30 yrs, n = 213;

Discussion

This study examined the interaction effects of variation in the CRHR1 gene and age on individual differences in working memory. We hypothesized that GG-homozygous individuals of rs110402 and rs242924 would show impaired WM performance that might be magnified by increased CRH production with advancing age. Our results show an impact of genotype already in middle age with significantly better performance in AT-carriers compared to GG-homozygotes. In old age, there were no significant differences

Role of the funding source

Financial support for the conduct of the research was provided by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; ECC 302-405). The funding source had no involvement in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Contributors

Drs Grimm and Gärtner contributed equally to this work. Drs Grimm, Bajbouj, Heekeren, Jacobs and Heuser designed the study and supervised the project. Mr Fuge carried out the experiment. Ms Fan, Ms Feeser, Drs Grimm, Gärtner, Weigand and Aust analyzed the data. Drs Grimm and Gärtner wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors report neither potential conflict of interest nor financial interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the team of Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion for their technical support.

References (72)

  • I.J. Heuser et al.

    Age-associated changes of pituitary-adrenocortical hormone regulation in humans: importance of gender

    Neurobiol Aging

    (1994)
  • D.T. Hubbard et al.

    Activation of basolateral amygdala corticotropin-releasing factor 1 receptors modulates the consolidation of contextual fear

    Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • A.J. Knoops et al.

    Loss of entorhinal cortex and hippocampal volumes compared to whole brain volume in normal aging: the SMART-Medea study

    Psychiatry Res

    (2012)
  • P.M. Maras et al.

    Sculpting the hippocampus from within: stress, spines, and CRH

    Trends Neurosci

    (2012)
  • B.S. McEwen et al.

    The brain on stress: vulnerability and plasticity of the prefrontal cortex over the life course

    Neuron

    (2013)
  • S. Qin et al.

    Acute psychological stress reduces working memory-related activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • M.C. Sander et al.

    Lifespan age differences in working memory: a two-component framework

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2012)
  • A. Schierloh et al.

    Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor type 1-dependent modulation of synaptic plasticity

    Neurosci Lett

    (2007)
  • S.M. Staufenbiel et al.

    Effect of beta and gamma neurofeedback on memory and intelligence in the elderly

    Biol Psychol

    (2014)
  • E.V. Sullivan et al.

    Preservation of hippocampal volume throughout adulthood in healthy men and women

    Neurobiol Aging

    (2005)
  • D.F. Swaab et al.

    The stress system in the human brain in depression and neurodegeneration

    Ageing Res Rev

    (2005)
  • A.R. Tyrka et al.

    Interaction of childhood maltreatment with the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene: effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • K.B. Walhovd et al.

    Consistent neuroanatomical age-related volume differences across multiple samples

    Neurobiol Aging

    (2011)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Endoplasmic reticulum stress contributes to CRH-induced hippocampal neuron apoptosis

    Exp Cell Res

    (2012)
  • A. Baddeley

    Working memory: looking back and looking forward

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2003)
  • P.B. Baltes et al.

    Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging?

    Psychol Aging

    (1997)
  • A.M. Bao et al.

    Gender difference in age-related number of corticotropin-releasing hormone-expressing neurons in the human hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and the role of sex hormones

    Neuroendocrinology

    (2007)
  • E.B. Binder et al.

    The CRF system, stress, depression and anxiety-insights from human genetic studies

    Mol Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • T. Blank et al.

    Priming of long-term potentiation in mouse hippocampus by corticotropin-releasing factor and acute stress: implications for hippocampus-dependent learning

    J Neurosci

    (2002)
  • P. Borkenau et al.

    NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrae (NEO-FFI)

    (2008)
  • R.G. Bradley et al.

    Influence of child abuse on adult depression: moderation by the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • L.S. Broster et al.

    Does emotional memory enhancement assist the memory-impaired?

    Front Aging Neurosci

    (2012)
  • K.L. Brunson et al.

    Neurobiology of the stress response early in life: evolution of a concept and the role of corticotropin releasing hormone

    Mol Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • K.L. Brunson et al.

    Long-term, progressive hippocampal cell loss and dysfunction induced by early-life administration of corticotropin-releasing hormone reproduce the effects of early-life stress

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2001)
  • S.N. Burke et al.

    Neural plasticity in the ageing brain

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2006)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Rapid loss of dendritic spines after stress involves derangement of spine dynamics by corticotropin-releasing hormone

    J Neurosci

    (2008)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Relations among CRFR1 and FKBP5 genotype, cortisol, and cognitive function in aging humans: A Project FRONTIER study

      2022, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Here, we examine the role of baseline cortisol and genotype on changes in cognitive function over time in a non-demented population of community dwelling rural Americans. We analyzed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 2 different genes: CRFR1 and FKPB5, as these SNPs influence stress reactivity (CRFR1) and tissue-level actions of glucocorticoids (FKBP5), and both have been implicated in cognitive function [41–46]. Using a longitudinal dataset from the Project FRONTIER database, maintained by Garrison Institute on Aging at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, we address several questions.

    • Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis-related genes and cognition in major mood disorders and schizophrenia: a systematic review

      2020, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies performed in healthy humans also show similar results. Different groups have suggested an effect of CRHR1 SNPs rs110402 and rs242924 in the association between early life stress and age on hippocampal and prefrontal cortex tasks such as working memory (Fuge et al., 2014; Grimm et al., 2015). The same variation has also been associated with impaired emotional empathy related to early life stress (Grimm et al., 2017).

    • CRH Promotes the Neurogenic Activity of Neural Stem Cells in the Adult Hippocampus

      2019, Cell Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      In humans, abnormal function of the CRH system has been associated with psychiatric disorders, while epigenetic changes in the CRH gene are related to a general psychiatric risk score in adolescents (Jokinen et al., 2018). Moreover, SNPs in the CRHR1 gene have been linked to the modulation of age-dependent effects on working memory, suggestive of compromised hippocampal function (Grimm et al., 2015; Jokinen et al., 2018; Sautter et al., 2003). Despite the increasing evidence on the local role of CRH in the maintenance of brain homeostasis, the actual role of CRH on adult hippocampal neurogenesis remains unknown.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Both authors contributed equally.

    View full text