ReviewMultimedia educational aids for improving consumer knowledge about illness management and treatment decisions: A review of randomized controlled trials
Introduction
One of the great challenges and opportunities facing clinicians today is the increasing complexity of healthcare treatment options. To make a truly informed healthcare decision, individuals need to comprehend key information about its purpose, potential risks and benefits, and available alternatives; similarly, for patients to be active participants in managing chronic illnesses, they need to have an adequate understanding of the illness, including needed dietary and lifestyle modifications, self measurement (such as glucose level, weight, etc.), and medication usage (Bodenheimer et al., 2002).
In recent years, psychiatric practice has becoming increasingly more complex in terms of the available treatment options, use of new technologies for assessments, and a need for psychiatric patients and their caregivers to be familiar with general medical procedures. Thus, in view of the recent FDA warnings about the risk of suicidality with antidepressants (FDA, 2005b) as well as that of diabetes, weight gain, strokes, and mortality with atypical antipsychotics (Jin et al., 2004, FDA, 2005a), there is an increasing responsibility on the clinician to ensure that patients and their caregivers are adequately informed about the risk: benefit ratio as well as alternative treatments and consequences of non-treatment of adolescents with depression or of persons with schizophrenia taking atypical antipsychotics. Medicare-approved use of PET scanning to assess risk of Alzheimer disease in vulnerable persons (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2005) illustrates the use of complicated technological procedures such as functional brain imaging and genetic screening in routing clinical practice in near future. Furthermore, new treatments with techniques that may not be easy to explain verbally, such as the vagal nerve stimulation (Groves and Brown, 2005), point to a future with increasingly more technology-based interventions and evaluations in psychiatric practice. This trend will intensify in the years to come. Routine methods of providing information relevant to clinical decision making about healthcare evaluations or management are often suboptimal. Relatively little research has been done on enhancing the capacity of psychiatric patients and the caregivers to make truly informed decisions about management.
In this paper, we review studies that compared the effects of multimedia (video- or computer-based) educational aids with those of routine procedures to inform healthcare consumers about medical evaluations or management. To date most of this type of research has been conducted in non-psychiatric patients. However, we believe that the challenge of educating the recipients of mental healthcare as well as their caregivers may be even more important due to the cognitive impairment associated with a number of psychiatric disorders, and due to the growing need for providing greater information about the potential risks of some mental health treatments.
Numerous factors, including clinical and demographic variables, affect patients’ desire to be involved in decision making about their own illnesses. These include the type/complexity of decision, recency of related medical events, and potential outcome of the decision (Deber et al., 1996, Mansell et al., 2000). Coping style (active vs. passive), age, and education also play a role in patients’ desire for participation in the decision-making process (Arora and McHorney, 2000). Furthermore, learning styles vary widely among adults; no “one size fits all” strategy is likely to serve different purposes for different people. In this complex landscape of varying preferences for information and involvement, different learning styles, and increasingly complex medical information, patient education materials serve important communicative functions. These materials educate and inform, and in many cases, convey the uncertainty involved in decision making (DePalma, 2000). Patient education materials may also encourage and empower some patients to take more active roles in managing their illnesses (Von Korff et al., 2002).
While traditional patient education relies heavily on printed materials such as pamphlets, newer multimedia methods are raising exciting prospects in this area. Videotapes were heralded as an early multimedia electronic innovation in patient education. Investigators believed that videos could enhance education procedures (especially for persons with limited literacy), help model behaviors, be cost-effective, and increase standardization of information provided (Malone, 1983, Gagliano, 1988, Ward et al., 1984, Baker et al., 1996, Murphy et al., 2000, Huss et al., 1991). Prior reviews of studies that used videotape or television for patient education found short-term benefits in terms of patient knowledge, but concluded that more research was needed on how best to utilize them (Gagliano, 1988, Nielsen and Sheppard, 1988).
More recently, computer-based educational interventions have been tapped to deliver information. A recent Cochrane Review evaluated the existing literature on the use of decisional aids for helping patients make “preference sensitive” healthcare decisions, where there is no “single best choice, because people vary in the … personal importance that they place on the benefits versus the harms of the different options” (O’Connor et al., 2004). Consumer knowledge was one of the outcomes measured in many of the studies reviewed, and some of these investigations used video or computer-based education. However, many aspects of healthcare, such as chronic disease management, are not necessarily “preference sensitive” but still require that consumers be knowledgeable and active participants in their healthcare. We are not aware of any recent reviews of the effects of multimedia educational aids (defined as utilizing both an auditory-verbal channel, and a visual-pictorial channel (Mayer, 2002) on patients’ understanding of information relevant to illness management and healthcare decision-making. Yet, there is a need for systematically evaluating such new educational tools (Bergkamp, 1996, Rosoff, 1999).
Below we present a review of randomized controlled trials of multimedia tools to improve patients’ (or caregivers’) understanding of health-related information, with the primary outcome being improvement on an objective measure of knowledge. Tomorrow’s psychiatric practitioner will likely be using varied means of informing the users of mental healthcare and their family members. While a large majority of the studies reviewed here are from non-psychiatric fields, utilizing experiences from other areas of medicine could be valuable for psychiatrists too.
Section snippets
Methods
We conducted a literature search to identify published articles that empirically investigated the effects of multimedia programs to inform patients (or caregivers) about their medical evaluation or management. Only randomized controlled trials published in English which reported objective measures of knowledge or understanding were included. We excluded studies that focused on theoretical healthcare decisions because of potential concerns regarding the validity of hypothetical medical
Results
Thirty-seven studies were included in this review and are summarized in Table 2. Twenty three (61%) of the 37 studies reported positive results, and the remaining 14 reported negative results.
Discussion
We reviewed 37 randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of video- or computer-based multimedia tools to improve patient or caregiver knowledge about medical evaluations or management. These articles were widely dispersed in different medical disciplines. Thirteen of the 22 video-based studies and 10/15 computer-based investigations (total 23/37) were labeled “positive”. A number of negative reports were characterized by comparable improvement in both experimental and control
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by NIMH Grants MH-43693, MH-49671, MH-59101, MH-01452, MH-64722, MH-62341, MH-66062, MH-64722, and MH-62341,by the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD), and by the Department of Veterans Affairs. We also acknowledge the technical expertise of several computer experts in our Research Center (Bernard Hernandez, Bob Fell, Nha Vo, Shah Golshan, and Anne Bailey) in comparing different technologies.
References (81)
- et al.
A randomized trial using videotape to present consent information for colonoscopy
Gastrointest Endosc
(1994) - et al.
Benefits of a computer-assisted education program for hypertensive patients compared with standard education tools
Patient Education and Counseling
(1995) - et al.
Vagal nerve stimulation: a review of its application and potential mechanisms that mediate its clinical effects
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
(2005) - et al.
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
Controlled Clinical Trials
(1996) - et al.
Atypical antipsychotics and glucose dysregulation: a systematic review
Schizophrenia Research
(2004) - et al.
Effects of video information on precolonscopy anxiety and knowledge: a randomsed trial
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Television as a patient education tool: a review of its effectiveness
Patient Education and Counseling
(1988) - et al.
A randomized trial of a computerized versus an audio-booklet decision aid for women considering post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy
Patient Educ Couns
(2002) - et al.
The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
(1998) - et al.
Review: informed consent in clinical trials
Health Policy
(1996)
Patient satisfaction with an informed consent process
Cancer Pract
Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?
Medical Care
An experimental evaluation of an AIDS educational intervention for WIC mothers
Aids Education and Prevention
Working memory
Science
Working memory
The health care experience of patients with low literacy
Arch Fam Med
Descriptive study to compare patient recall of information: nurse-taught versus video supplement
Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal
A randomized trial of a multimedia shared decision-making program for men facing a treatment decision for benign prostatic hyperplasia
Disease Management and Clinical Outcomes
Quality of life as an outcome measure in evaluating mental health services: a review of the empirical evidence
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
The information highway and informed consent
European Journal of Health Law
A randomized controlled trial of information-giving to patients referred for coronary angiography: effects on outcomes of care
Health Expectations
Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care
Journal of the American Medical Association
A randomized trial comparing the effectiveness and preference of a touch-screen computer system with a leaflet for providing women with information on urinary symptoms suggestive of detrusor instability
BJU International
An experimental application of the Dephi-method to the use of experts
Manage Sci
What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?
Archives of Internal Medicine
Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes
Prostate cancer shared decision: a CD-ROM educational and decision-assisting tool for men with prostate cancer
Seminars in Urologic Oncology
The use of a video to convey preanesthestic information to patients undergoing ambulatory surgery
Anesth Analg
Problem areas in the understanding of informed consent: study of middle-aged and older patients with psychotic disorders
Psychopharmacology
Enhancing comprehension of consent for research in older patients with psychosis: a randomized study of a novel educational strategy
American Journal of Psychiatry
Videotape increases parent knowledge about Polivirus vaccines and choices of Polio vaccination schedules
Pediatrics
Randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of a video and information leaflet versus information leaflet alone on patient knowledge about surveillance and cancer risk in ulcerative colitis
Inflammatory Bowell Disease
Improving medication adherence through patient education distinguishing between appropriate and inappropriate utilization
Journal of Rheumatology
Genetic couseling for B-Thalassemia trait following health screening in a health maintenance organization: comparison of programmed and conventional counseling
American Journal of Human Genetics
Compliance with fecal occult blood test screening among low-income medical outpatients: a randomized controlled trial used a videotaped intervention
Journal of Cancer Education
Evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Cited by (60)
Animation or leaflet: Does it make a difference when educating young people about genome sequencing?
2021, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :Additionally, some clinics may not have the capacity to show an animation during the clinic appointment and may only be able to distribute written information to patients and their families. Unlike previous findings whereby animations were found to be more effective than static educational materials [18], we did not find any significant differences according to which intervention participants received other than for the questions assessing satisfaction. However, similar studies to our which have focused on GS education have been identified elsewhere.
The role of digital tools in the delivery of genomic medicine: enhancing patient-centered care
2021, Genetics in MedicineCitation Excerpt :For patients undergoing genomic counseling, digital tools have been shown to result in greater patient participation34,35 and from our previous trial on the decision aid, reduced time spent with a genetic counselor.13,34,35 Furthermore, studies of digital tools used across multiple decision-making contexts such as prenatal screening for Down syndrome, cancer screening, and preoperative ambulatory surgery, show improved knowledge, self-efficacy, and engagement.36 This is consistent with observations of our study participants, who became more verbally engaged when speaking with the counselor after using the digital tool, perhaps because it allowed them to control their learning15,37 and increase their sense of agency.38
Multimedia patient education to assist oral impression taking during dental treatment: A pilot study
2017, International Journal of Medical InformaticsDevelopment and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public
2016, Genetics in MedicineCitation Excerpt :Videos with voiceover may be more accessible than written information for people with low literacy.24,25 Multimedia videos may lead to greater comprehension than other delivery formats.26,27,28 One advantage of animation in educational videos is that the characters can be made race- and ethnicity-neutral.